Chemistry in Coronavirus Research: A Free-to-Read Collection from the American Chemical Society

Scientists have moved rapidly to characterize 2019-nCoV and widely disseminate their findings amongst the international research community as quickly as possible. One important example of this is the homology models of the novel coronavirus cysteine protease produced by Stoermer. The rapid availability of nCoV genomic data made possible the production of first-generation homology models for 3CLpro cysteine protease; an enzyme which is crucial for viral replication and has been explored previously as a target for antiviral therapies in the treatment of another coronavirus, SARS. This preprint notes that though the viral genome bears a close similarity to bat coronaviruses, the protease exhibits the closest homology with SARS CoV protease a zoonotic virus that entered the human population via civets.

Huang et al. used crystallographic and biophysical methods to conduct structural and functional characterization of HKU9-RBD — a bat coronavirus that has not crossed over to humans. The rationale for these studies was that bat betacoronaviruses (a genus that includes SARS and MERS) should be well characterized in the event that they end up being the source of the next global pandemic. Upon comparison of the HKU9-RBD receptor-binding domain (RBD) to the available structures of the SARS-, MERS-, and HKU4- (another bat coronavirus) RBDs, the authors found that even though the evolutionary histories of RNA viruses tend to be difficult to determine due to substantial evolutionary pressure, the coronaviruses in this study exhibited several conserved tertiary structural features in the core subdomain of the spike (S) protein. This spike protein, present on the virion surface, is a key factor in determining the species tropism of the virus as it is involved in receptor recognition and membrane fusion as part of the mechanism of infection. The authors concluded that their findings supported the notion that the S protein of betaCoV divergently evolves from a common ancestor, particularly in the external RBD region, and that this determines the potential of a particular betaCoV virus for interspecies transmission.

Lee et al. conducted high-throughput screening of 25,000 compounds, seeking a small molecule dual inhibitor for the papain-like protease (PLpro) enzymes of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV. The authors were able to identify a compound with inhibitory activity against both enzymes though interestingly, despite the fact that the two enzymes bear significant similarities in their overall structures and catalytic sites, the identified compound acts as a competitive inhibitor against MERS-CoV PLpro, and an allosteric inhibitor against SARS-CoV PLpro as determined using SPR. Further, though this suggests that the inhibitor recognition specificity of the compound may differ for MERS-CoV PLpro and SARS-CoV PLpro, the inhibitor was selective for both of these over two human homologs. Two residues identified through structure and sequence alignments, Y269 and Q270 of the SARS-CoV PLpro were replaced by T274 and A275 in MERS-CoV PLpro complicating the potential for critical binding interactions. Taking this into consideration along with the finding that none of the four tested SARS-CoV PLpro lead inhibitors were effective against MERS-CoV PLpro, it is notable that a dual functionality inhibitor was identified for both of the SARS and MERS papain-like proteases.

The development of therapeutics for known coronaviruses, as well as 2019-nCoV, is an active research area. A review by Morse et al. deposited on ChemRxiv discusses potential prevention and treatment options for 2019-nCoV. There are four crucial enzymes that are necessary for pathogenesis: the spike protein that facilitates virus entry through the host cell surface receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, the coronavirus main protease 3CLpro and the papain-like protease PLpro that are involved in assembly of new virions, and the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase RdRp that facilitates replication of the CoV RNA genome. The authors argue that the differences between the SARS-CoV and 2019-nCoV spike protein will likely require the development of novel therapeutics. The PLpro enzymes from the two viruses only share 83% sequence identity but do not differ in their main secondary structure components that form the active site. Hence, inhibitors developed for the SARS-nCoV PLpro may also be active against the 2019-nCoV enzyme.  The 2019-nCoV and SARS RdRp and 3CLpro share significant sequence identity and would make the application of previously developed small molecule therapeutics based on the SARS-CoV proteins feasible, such as remdesivir and 3LCpro-1.

A more general review by Falcinelli et al. presents the importance of integrating clinical and basic research for the investigation of viral pathogens and the development of novel therapeutics. A perspective by Pillaiyar et al. provides an overview of chemotherapies developed against the SARS protease SARS-CoV 3CLpro between 2003, when the SARS outbreak occurred, and 2015. Mehellou et al. review the ProTide technology in their miniperspective, an approach that facilitates intracellular delivery of nucleoside analog monophosphates and monophosphates. The ProTide GS-5734 developed by Gilead Sciences reportedly exhibited broad-spectrum antiviral activity against a number of viruses, including coronaviruses. In their viewpoint, Schor and Einav discuss the repurposing of existing drugs as broad-spectrum agents for the treatment of intracellular pathogens and point out that kinase inhibitors, such as imatinib and nilotinib inhibit coronaviruses such as SARS and MERS. An article published in Chemical & Engineering News reports on the mobilization efforts of drug companies and biotechnology firms to rapidly develop diagnostics and treatments for 2019-CoV

Original research articles featured in this Virtual Issue include the article by Wang et al. who disclose a strategy for preparing a vaccine against SARS-CoV that involved targeting a specific epitope of the virus spike protein. Yoon et al. report the synthesis of aristeromycin analogs as dual-target antiviral compounds capable of inhibiting the RdRp proteinase of various RNA viruses and the host cell S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase. Two articles by Kei Liu and colleagues present viral fusion inhibitors against MERS-COV.

Kvach et al. report the development of the first substrate-like APOBEC3 inhibitors as a strategy for augmenting antiviral (and anticancer) therapies. APOBEC3, an enzyme that is a component of the innate immune system, mounts an effective defense against viral infection by altering pathogen-derived genetic material and thereby rendering it non-functional. Specifically, APOBEC3 converts 2’-deoxycytidines to 2’-deoxyuridines on single-stranded DNA via deamination. Viruses have of course evolved strategies to use this mutagenesis function of APOBEC3 to their advantage or to evade it altogether. The authors investigate ssDNA that include the cytidine nucleoside analog 2’-deoxyzebularine as substrate-like APOBEC3 inhibitors; the first such platform for this application.

Coronavirus Virtual Issue – Update 2/17

Exploiting the similarities in active site morphology of the main and 3C proteases of coronaviruses and enteroviruses, Zhang et al. pursued broad-spectrum antivirals by designing, synthesizing and characterizing peptidomimetic a-ketoamides inhibitors. Evaluation of lead compounds against the recombinant proteases, in viral replicons, and in virus-infected cells led to further optimization efforts culminating in the discovery of compound 11r that demonstrated potent anti-MERS-CoV activity in a human liver cell line. Due to the similarities exhibited by proteases of MERS-CoV and the novel coronavirus, the authors propose that compound 11r is likely also active against COVID-19.

ACS Publications is committed to rapidly communicating urgent developments in characterizing, preventing, and treating the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) or the disease it causes, COVID-19. As part of that commitment, we’re working to assist anyone whose research relates to COVID-19 to publish and share their results as quickly as possible.

We invite you to submit your COVID-19 or coronavirus-related manuscript to one of our journals.

Consideration for COVID-19 Manuscripts & Published Articles

Due to the unique nature of the current situation, ACS Publications has some special measures in place for handling manuscripts and published articles related to COVID-19/coronavirus:

• For a limited time, free editing services are available for all manuscripts related to COVID-19/coronavirus. Visit ACS Authoring Services to learn more.
• COVID-19/coronavirus-related articles included in the Chemistry in Coronavirus Research Virtual Issue are free to read through the end of 2020.
• ACS Publications is sharing all articles related to COVID-19/coronavirus with the World Health Organization (WHO) immediately upon publication, for inclusion in the WHO COVID-19 research database.

Use a Preprint to Share Your Results Even Faster

ACS also welcomes submissions to the preprint server ChemRxiv.

When you post a draft of your manuscript on ChemRxiv, you can share your results with the community and get feedback ahead of formal peer review and publication. You can also use ChemRxiv’s Direct Journal Transfer feature to submit a posted preprint to an established journal for editorial consideration and peer review.

All ACS journals accept manuscripts that have been previously published on ChemRxiv.

Special Issue Calls for Papers

Specific ACS Publications journals are inviting manuscript submissions for Special Issues:

Environmental Science & Technology

ES&T Special Issue Call for Papers: Environmental Transmission and Control of COVID-19

Journal of Chemical Education

Call for Papers: Special Issue on Insights Gained While Teaching Chemistry in the Time of COVID-19

Journal of Proteome Research

Call for Papers: Special Issue on Proteomics and its Application in Pandemic Diseases